Mike Tyson Tattoos

I am currently on EAD from 485 application (no H1b)..My 485 is applied in eb3 category. Also i-140 is approved.. I have moved to a new position in the same compnay where the job duties are 50% different from the earlier position.The Position also entitles me to start another Green card application under EB2. My QUestion is


Is it possible to apply for another GC in Eb2 and use the EAd status from the Eb3 application? Since I do not have
an h1b my only valid status in US is EAD and 485 from the Eb3 application

I am working for a american company as a consultant thru a Desi Consultancy for past 6 years. And my H1 also held by the same desi consultancy company. My company filed for new H1 petion and got approved last october. He came to US on last friday (Newark, NJ)and was deported for some reason. I dont know the exact reason. So i have few question. I really appreciate all your help

1. My H1B is going to expir by Sep 2010 and i sent all the documents to file for H1 extn based on my approved I-140. My company lawer filed for LC and it is still pending. So is it going to affect my H1 extn?

2. How about my GC process? Does it affect if i apply I-485 when my periorty date become couurent?

3. What will happen to my company? My employer is stright forward guy. He has all the documention and Tax.

Hi,

I have a pretty simple question.

A person decides to change employers, moving from company A to company B. It's been 180 days after 485 filing.

Question: what does company B have to do to legally take this person on as full time employee? Is the process any different than taking any other american resident employee? The way I understand is it is not any different.

Please advise,
Thanks,
Vlad


If you are looking to use your EAD then I believe their is a form that you fill in with your employer and off you go. Informing USCIS or not will be your choice read around in this forum to find different opinions and more info on AC21.

Hi,

I just got an update on my and my wife I-485; i dont know what it is but they have requested for more information.
Can any one clarrify that who will get the RFE? will it be me or my lawyer?
If possible can any tell what it would be?

Thanks in advance !!!

Hi All,

I am thinking of doing PERM filing on my own under EB2 category.I need suggestions from optimistic members about this possibility.Also,please if you can provide links(website) which can help me through this stupid & cumbersome process.

PEACE

My passport is expiring in March. I live in NY metro . Does anyone knows the procedure to renew the passport while in the USA. Please share your experience.

You can go to this website and get all the needed info....

http://www.indiacgny.org/

Also, there were atleast 2 threads discussing PP renewals..You can do a search for those threads for renewal timelines...I think it takes them 2-3 weeks in NY Consulate to mail the new passport....You can go for tatkal service and get it issued the same day if you pay $90 extra....

Thanks for the responses. I have all the documents in place and also the recent paystubs of my present employer.

I've received an answer in the WPF forum :
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/70e5bace-be65-422d-b4d7-7a4e7a866837

Hello All,

My first I-140 (EB3) got denied and is pending in appeals office for more than 1-1/2 years. Since 140 was denied my 485 was also denied.

Later we filed new labor (in 2009) and 140 (EB-2) and got approval after 8 months.

My questions are:

1. Can I file 'motion to reopen' for 485s based on new 140 approval and use the previous priority date (which is 2004)?

2. If not, can I file motion to reopen 485 based on old 140 (which is pending in appeals office) and later if they are open, can we link these 485s with new 140?

Please advise.

How can you MTR for the 485 which was denied based on a denied 140? What were the grounds for denial? You might have to wait for the approval of the old 140 and then use that PD? You can port the old PD provided the older application is finally approved following the apeals. Just my 2 cents. Check with others/attorney.

In general, macro lenses around 100mm are good for most kinds of macro photography. They have too much working distance for use on a copy stand, and not quite enough for skittish and/or dangerous insects or small animals. For general purpose stuff, the angle of view is such that you get enough background isolation to be worthwhile (you can rotate around your subject just a bit to get a highlight out of the background, while a 50mm macro takes in more background and makes this difficult).

I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.