Mike Tyson Tattoos

The other day you spent the entire day answering every question(s) people had. I even told my wife that our good friend is going to take all our worries out pretty soon. EB2 will no longer going accept porting so we will go faster and then guess what you didn't even file the law suit yet....you let us down!!

I have a humble suggestion for you, please concentrate on your work and read some books on ethics and leave the GC processing to CIS.

This is weird... It does'nt look like you are joking, so are you are indirectly demanding and taunting a Mr anonymous to take some action?

action from which you will benefit directly and is also something which you feel strongly about but will not do anything by yourself? :eek:

............. People getting h-1b would mainly F-1 students.

Good that you used mainly , although the tone of the passage is ONLY. Any case, new mantra is R=G.

Hi
Any body got finger print appointment letter who filed on Aug3.
Thanks
AJ

Since we are in a fighting mood, I will throw some fuel to the fire :) :)

To conclude:
If reservations stays; 25% upper caste can enjoy 50% of resources.
If reservation system goes away due to uplifting of backward classes; 25% of upper caste will have to satisfy themselves with only 25% of resources.
================================================== ====
Brother your assumption is flawed if someone come under reservation category they get their guaranteed reservation seat (on their merit basis in that class) if reservation % is fulfilled as per rule then their application goes to open category. That means 50% resources is for everyone in India.
This was happened few years back to get admission in one of top Medical school after scoring more than 92% was not able to get to desired top medical school but one of his friend who had just scored 58% was able to get in top notch medical school. Now this remind me similar situation what was happened 50 years before. Now making matter worst student who had got 92% was belonging to very middle class or you can say poor family but his friend was belonging to class one gazetted officer�s family (I would classify them upper middle class).
I think reservation was required in past to up-lift backward class and give them justice in system but now situation is change drastically we see people from all class is on same page .if someone wants to argue on this that is fine. In real sense if we need reservation then it should be on economics basis everyone should file taxes and they should get reservation accordingly with merits .In this way government will get more revenue and on the whole we will have fair justice to everyone (all cast )and this will provide better visibility what is happening to normal families. Now some will debate how we can avoid fraud for reporting low income then hey that is what government should be doing, proving infrastructure and enforcing rule of law other than that government has no business in dictating which cast is upper cast or lower cast.
Now real question pose by the other users here are we better-off here or back home? I think we always indulge in material benefits but there are other aspect of life you cannot put face value on it .What matter is the most are you Happy? What is your ultimate goal of life? What is the most important thing you want to have in your life? What is the most irritating thing you cannot overlook or make you uncomfortable? On top of all these key questions what are tools /resources available to you to address all these likes dislikes. So let us say if you are shooting for quality life then define what must have for that life and to get those you may have to bite bullet and compromise on some of those. If you can find middle ground some where there then we call those people happy people or successful people. So life is about making right choice all the time as per your own situations. When we are in this fine-tuning process we can always use help from our resources, friends, relative, culture, God, Money and our own intellectual.

Any comment from anyone?

Wanted to know what the members here think of the probability of receiving RFE from USCIS to find out whether the applicant is still in a "same or similar" job when the time comes to adjudicate cases for for EB3 India.

I ask this because in a poll conducted in a separate thread, it seems the number of people waiting for their GCs are more with PDs before Dec 2004 than after that date.

When the dates become current again for these people, do you think USCIS will be sending RFEs to get the employment information for every single of them ? Is there is a percentage from the pending applications that they pick for RFE, assuming all applicants who changed employers DID NOT notify USCIS when they changed jobs OR is it completely up to the whims of the adjudicating officer to send an RFE ?

There are several people I know who changed employers with EAD, never notified USCIS and got their GCs without any RFE. Trying to understand whether USCIS will think twice before sending RFEs for everyone as the number of applicants waiting with PDs of 2004 and earlier are huge now than ever before. Won't it be too overwhelming for them to issue RFEs to all and manage their responses?

Congrats.. You made it

hope you and all EB3 guys hear some good news soon... i know it must be hard to see EB2 with later PD being approved while you still wait.. and wait... and wait.....

Mehul

I resonate the feelings of all on this forum, God bless you and your family, these are some thoughts coming to my mind... all might not be feasible in your case so take what you think might help the current situation and make an informed decision.

- Find an "good" immigration lawyer, most immigration lawyers are very community minded, they might also help you without any fees.

- There is a huge fiji community in US I am talking about well established business people (especially in automobile industry) who can help in applying a H1 visa for your wife as a backup and also meet local politicians, and take an infopass appointment to know what really happens to such cases like yours.

- Since you are a Indian Citizen you can go to India for a second opinion if you prefer to, there are great Doctors who studied in US and went back to start their own clinics. Canada is another country who gives free health care and have a shorter immigration process.

- Life in India will also be less expensive if you decide to live there with your savings of 8 years, you might want to look into India's policy on Fiji citizen immigration if your wife/children are Fiji citizens.

- I am sure you must have looked into cancer survivor stories, stem cell research, marrow transplant, blood transfusion and treatment options.

- Last but not least, concentrate on getting better - fight back, also look into your life insurance options, property papers and write a Will.

God Bless you from what i can understand you are a fighter dealing with health issues, Fiji immigration issues and US immigration issues I am sure you will post a message here at a later date that how you survived and this whole thing will be just a bad episode in your life which came and went away.

Spouse can stay in the country as far as her/his 485 has been applied before EB primary got a GC and after EB primary PD was current.

It WILL matter if while filing 485 EB & EB dependents have to use EB PD & FB PD respectively because then it could happen that EB primary got GC but EB dependent was never able to file 485.

In most cases it WON'T matter if while filing 485 EB & EB dependents can both use EB PD.

So if EB Dependents can use FB Quota but EB PD that would be really good for us. Off course clarification from attorney is always a good idea.

Our intention is to findout if CIS interpretation is correct. If spouse can stay in the country with EAD and AP and if Primary gets GC first. It won't matter much becos, that EAD will not have any strings attached on same or similar etc. So we should be OK.

LEGAL AND STUCK IN - 7 YRS. ILLEGAL AND SNUCK IN - 7 MINS. CHOOSE!

It is a fact that EB3 India is a FORGOTTEN category. There appears to be a sense of intra-category elitism within the larger community that comes together at IV. EB3 I's make feeble attempts to be heard and some take a shot at innovative marketing campaigns to call attention to the plight of being stuck for over 6 ot 7 years in some cases. EB2 I's immediately respond with a self protectionist attitude and preach a higher calling that focuses on comprehensive solutions instead of piecemeal solutions. EB1 I's obviously choose to remain outside the fray, since these are matter of concern to vox populi, not them.

Some EB2's and EB3's then analyse the hell out of USCIS logic, to the extent that they could become full time spin meisters for ANY public organization. With very little fact, a healthy dose of opinion and a mish mash of 'logic', they piece together their 'strong' arguments -one way or the other.

Lost in this useless din of irrelevant analysis paralysis is the real misery of thousands of EB3 I's (such as myself) that have been stuck for years for no fault of ours. By the way, I happen to be a highly educated (for those that care) Executive that went to Top Private Universities in the US that happens to be stuck in EB3 ONLY because the company HR rep and lawyer at the time, chose to go down this path. POint being, there is no reason for EB2 I's to pontificate from a sense of elitist protectionism because there are EB3 I's like me that can outsmart a bunch of you in no time. Seriously. (This is for those that preach that if you are 'smart' you should be in EB2. Go read those threads).

So bottomline, let us stop behaving like CIS vs Anti CIS camps and instead UNITE towards the common cause. Let EB3I's air their frustrations. If you can come to help, do so. If not, stay out of it completely. No more half ass 'logic', please.

Thanks!

Its unfortunate that you ask us to UNITE and use 'EB2 elitist protectionism' in the same breath. I am not even going down the road of EB3 'smarter' than EB2 because a reverse argument is equally valid if not more. The law as stated above is what it is - there is a clear categorizaton established by law. If there is a level of frustration with it then a campaign to change it makes sense. However any proposed changes that arbitrarily assigns visa numbers just because 'my HR filed it the way it got filed' then you need to check with your HR and port over to EB2 - if you think your private US degree qualifies you for it. The position determines EB2 or EB3 and I'll leave it at that.

I have no problems in people expressing their opinion in an open forum and lobbying for change. The devil is in the detail. If the change means taking the EB2 excess visas to give to EB3 purely based on length of wait then I have every right to present another point of view - elitist protectionism or not.
I have only seen implications to this effect but nobody has come forward and said it plainly - yes we are EB3 and we want the EB2 excess visas because we have waited seven years. Everybody seems to imply it but nobody wants to call it as plainly as I stated it above. I am only presenting a counter to that.

i was feeling a lil down too for the last cupl of days...responding to some of those posters/reading their comments on alipac really brought me down.

however i m feeling better now seeing the drama on immigration portal june visa bulletin thread...not that i am a drama monger.. but seeing drama between two professionals really spices things up.. why else are boxing and wwf interesting


http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=247589

What is your application PD and Category?

My priorty date is 17th Jan 2003 Eb3(2)-India.
485 filed on 31st july 2007.
I also got a lud on my I-140 on 27th of july 2008. It is an approved I-140.
Has anyone else gotten a lud on their I-140 also ?
Thanks.

Here is some more fax numbers (older entries moved to the bottom of this post):
From http://www.edgar.k12.wi.us/cloverbelt/medialist.htm

Eau Claire Leader-Telegram 1-715-858-7308
Wausau Daily Herald 1-715-848-9361
Chippewa Herald Telegram 1-715-723-9644
Marshfield News Herald 1-715-387-4175
Wisconsin Rapids Tribune 1-715-848-9361
St. Point Journal 1-715-344-7229
Medford Star News 1-715-748-2699

TV 7 – Wausau 1-715-842-0879
TV 9 – Wausau 1-715-848-0195
TV 13 – Eau Claire 1-715-832-0246
TV 18 – Eau Claire 1-715-831-1859

From http://www.nynjtc.org/issues/natmedia.html

New York Times: FAX: 212.556.7614
Washington Post: FAX: 310.277.3704
Time Magazine: FAX: 212.522.1530
Newsweek: FAX: 212.445.4120
USA Today: FAX: 703.247.3108
Wall Street Journal: FAX: 202.862.9266
NPR: FAX: 202.414.3329
AP: FAX: 202.776.9570
CNN: FAX: 404.681.3578
Chicago Tribune: FAX: 202.824.8302
Los Angeles Times: FAX: 213.237.7968
San Francisco Chronicle: email: letters@sfchronicle.com
San Diego Union: FAX: 619.293.1440
Sacramento Bee: FAX: 916.321.1196
Oakland Tribune: FAX: 510.208.6477
Long Beach Press Telegram: FAX: 562.499.1277
Monterey County Herald: FAX: 831.372.8401

___________________________________

Here is the list copied from http://www.patrickcrusade.org/Fax.html:

ABC WASHINGTON DC 202-887-7684
ABC 20/20 NEW YORK NY 212-456-2969

ABC NEWS PRESIDENT NEW YORK NY 212-456-4968

ABC TV LOS ANGELES CA 213-557-5210

ABC TV SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-954-7633

ABC WORLD NEWS NEW YORK NY 212-456-4968

AP LOS ANGELES CA 213-748-1200

AP SAN DIEGO CA 619-291-2098

AP WASHINGTON DC 202-828-6422

AP (BROADCAST) WASHINGTON DC 202-955-7367

ASSOCIATED PRESS BOSTON MA 617-338-8125

ASSOCIATED PRESS LOS ANGELES CA 213-748-9836

ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOENIX AZ 602-254-9573

ASSOCIATED PRESS SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-552-9430

ASSOCIATED PRESS MN MINNEAPOLIS MN 612-332-4245

BOSTON GLOBE BOSTON MA 617-929-3183

BOSTON GLOBE BOSTON MA 617-929-3192

BOSTON GLOBE BOSTON MA 617-929-3490

BOSTON GLOBE NEWSRM BOSTON MA 617-929-3186

BOSTON HERALD BOSTON MA 617-426-1865

BOSTON HERALD BOSTON MA 617-542-1315

C-SPAN WASHINGTON DC 202-737-6226

CBS NEW YORK NY 212-975-1519

CBS WASHINGTON DC 202-659-2586

CBS (RADIO) WASHINGTON DC 202-659-5578

CBS EVE NEWS NEW YORK NY 212-975-2115

CBS MORNING WASHINGTON DC 202-331-1765

CBS NEWS LOS ANGELES CA 213-651-0285

CBS NEWS SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-362-7417

CBS NEWS PRESIDENT NEW YORK NY 212-975-1519

CBS TV LOS ANGELES CA 213-651-0321

CBS TV SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-362-7417

CHICAGO SUN-TIMES CHICAGO IL 312-321-3084

CHICAGO TRIBUNE CHICAGO IL 312-222-3143

CHRISTIAN SCI. MON. BOSTON MA 617-450-2317

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MO BOSTON MA 617-289-5352

CNBC HOLLYWOOD CA 213-465-1034

CNN LOS ANGELES CA 213-460-5081

CNN SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-398-4049

CNN PRESIDENT ATLANTA GA 404-827-1575

FORBES LOS ANGELES CA 213-478-8437

GANNETT WASHINGTON DC 202-243-0190

GANNETT NEWS SERVICE SACRAMENTO CA 916-446-7326

LOS ANGELES TIMES CHATSWORTH CA 818-772-3338

LOS ANGELES TIMES COSTA MESA CA 714-966-7711

LOS ANGELES TIMES LOS ANGELES CA 213-237-4712

LOS ANGELES TIMES SACRAMENTO CA 916-322-2422

LOS ANGELES TIMES VENTURA CA 805-658-5547

NBC WASHINGTON DC 202-362-2009

NBC (RADIO) WASHINGTON DC 703-685-2197

NBC NEWS BURBANK CA 818-840-4275

NBC NEWS NEW YORK NY 212-956-2140

NBC NEWS SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-441-2823

NBC NEWS PRESIDENT NEW YORK NY 212-315-4037

NBC TV LOS ANGELES CA 818-840-4275

NBC TV SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-441-2823

NEW YORK POST NEW YORK NY 212-732-4241

NEW YORK TIMES NEW YORK NY 212-556-4603

NEWSWEEK LOS ANGELES CA 213-444-5287

NEWSWEEK NEW YORK NY 212-421-4993

NEWSWEEK SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-788-4437

NEWSWEEK WASHINGTON DC 202-783-6512

NPRRADIO SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-553-2241

NY TIMES NEW YORK NY 212-556-4603

NY TIMES SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-421-2684

NY TIMES WASHINGTON DC 202-862-0340

REUTERS LOS ANGELES CA 213-622-0056

REUTERS SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-986-5147

REUTERS WASHINGTON DC 202-898-8383

TIME LOS ANGELES CA 213-824-7205

TIME SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-434-5209

TIME WASHINGTON DC 202-463-5005

TIME MAGAZINE NEW YORK NY 212-522-0451

UPI BOSTON MA 617-338-9774

UPI LOS ANGELES CA 213-620-1237

UPI SEATTLE WA 206-283-0408

UPI WASHINGTON DC 202-789-2362

UPI (RADIO) WASHINGTON DC 202-842-3625

US NEWS & WORLD REPORT WASHINGTON DC 202-955-2713

USA RADIO NETWORK DALLAS TX 214-243-3489

USA TODAY WASHINGTON DC 202-276-5527

WALL STREET JOURNAL WASHINGTON DC 202-862-9266

WALL STREET JOURNAL SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-391-4534

WALL STREET JOURNAL LOS ANGELES CA 213-658-3828

WALL STREET JOURNAL NEW YORK NY 212-416-2658

WALL STREET JOURNAL SAN FRANCISCO CA 415-391-4534

WASHINGTON POST WASHINGTON DC 202-334-4480


Here is the list copied from http://www.mothersalert.org/mediafax.html

CNN: 404-681-3578
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: 773-702-0725
New York Times: 212-556-7306
Washington Post: 202-496-3936
LA Times: 213-237-4712
CBS-TV Nightly News: 212-975-1893
60 Minutes: 212-975-2019
ABC Nightly News: 212-456-3720
UPI: 202-898-8057
AP: 212-621-7529
AFP [Agences France Presse]: 202-414-0524
Time Magazine: 212-522-0323
Newsweek Magazine: 212-212-445-5844
US News & World Report: 212-916-7400 or 212-716-6800 -- May or May Not Still Be Working
USA Today: 212-371-0241
CBC [Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]: 416-205-7459
Australian Broadcasting Corp.: 202-626-5188
Greenpeace USA: 202-462-4507
All International Greenpeace Fax#s Should be Accessable through: http://www.greenpeace.org
Center For Defense Information: 202-462-4559
Jim Hightower Show: 512-478-8536
Pacifica Radio's "Democracy Now": 212-747-1698 and 202-588-0896
Boston Globe: 617-929-2019
Der Speigel: 212-302-6258
Reuters: 202-898-8401
PBS' "Frontline: 617-254-0243
Penthouse Magazine:212-702-6279
Ralph Nader: 202-234-5176
Las Vegas Sun: 702-383-7264
NPR's "Talk of the Nation": 202-414-3329
Pacifica Radio, KPFK: 818-763-7526
Pacifica Radio, WPFW: 202-588-0561
Pacifica Radio, KPFT: 713-526-5750
Wall Street Journal: 212-416-2653
Christian Science Monitor: 212-764-9648

None of this damn crap is fair. There are 3 lines in the green card queue. 1) Labor/PERM line, further subdivided on the basis of BEC, PERM, Employer willingness, exempt(NIW) etc. 2) the I-140 Line and 3) the I-485 line. These lines each have inconsistent patterns depending upon the winds of the day, a few years ago, LC/BEC lines were long, employers were less willing to sponsor green cards, and there was no I-140 PP processing, now all of a sudden PERM is there, PP of 140 came into being, and 485 became an eternal wait and country quotas came into being. For those that got screwed with BECs then PP 140 got removed when they were ready to file and now PD retrogressed into the stone age, it sure would seem like non sense for the guy who got PERM in 2 weeks, then PP 140 in 10 days and filed 485 in he July fiasco. Nevertheless you are only speaking in terms of degrees of getting screwed, since all are being done so by an unpredictable and unreliable system.
None of this damn crap is fair, we all know it. The only fair thing is for this country to decide who it wants and needs and sort them out ASAP. A wait of 2yrs, 5yrs or 10 yrs is immaterial, all of the above are ridiculous in EB immigration, degrees of unfairness is splitting hairs if you ask me. Up to 2 yrs is understandable, but beyond that implies a broken system which we need to lobby to fix. If we can all agree on that then, we have a platform to move forward with, otherwise we will get nowhere. When you average out the way most immigrants came to this land....................all of us are way more contributing and deserving, lets try to remind people of that as well as our future potential.

ThinkTwice , very valid points.

May i also take a minute to thank you for staritng the original thread on this issue. We would have never come to know about this issue otherwise. Thanks !

I have requested Zoooom to do the same in the other thread and Zoooom is working on it. Thanks Zooom !


Zoom, I appreciate you having started this thread, I have a suggession - Can you please
- give a little back ground as to why we are starting this effort
- The source http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jul2007/db20070718_012859.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index _businessweek+exclusives
- Also some one mentioned that Aman was even considering SELLING his house to support OUR cause.
- what we intend to accomplish by this effort
- The manner in which the money that is collected will be admistered ( If this has not been finalized may be just mention that this is WIP)
- what our target is.

If you add all this information in the initial post it will give direction and substance to this effort.

Thanks
TT

My 140 was approved in 10 days from TSC and my attorney sent my 485 to TSC (they send the applications to the same ctr where your 140 got approved),my 485 reached on July 2 nd..no receipt yet ,no check cashed yet..
may be we should just wait for another 10 working days.They are still working on June cases(TSC)

Not sure if I got your question... .

I'm seeing lots of folks being greened whose PD is after us. Is it possible that they have PD on their 485 (because I-140 concurrently filed) and so it was picked up by officer? I guess it's not.

In response to infopass officer's request to expedite, I received letter from USCIS (within a week) . It shows my receipt# correct but shows filing date 10/10/2007. Actually, this is receipt date of case transfer to TSC from NSC.

First I like to thank you all those whose support me in this action of trying to eliminate the country and category based spillover usage. I see that there are lot of unrelated comments and discussions going on in this forum, let's not get ourself diverted and please focus on our mission to try to implement the usage of spill over visas based on priority date. There may be some unrelated comments still coming in, also some may discourage our actions, let's please ignore those, instead of responding (which just feeds them to write more).

I like to know who all have already contacted their local Congressman/woman for this issue. so let's take a poll by adding your IV id to the following list,

IV Id----------------Week of Contact-------------------Any update
Sanhari --------------- July 12 2010 --------------- Automated email response

Thanks again to all those who support this cause, let's continue to do our part and hope for the best for us to happen soon....

Looivy --------------- July 16 2010 (Jan Schakowsky) --------------- Automated email response
Looivy --------------- June 11 2010 (Burris) to oppose Sanders --------------- Automated email response
Looivy --------------- June 11 2010 (Durbin) to oppose Sanders --------------- He wants to reform H1 and L1 through his own Bill.

It would be better if we have a tracker database on IV website o/w this thread will grow madly.

July 3rd at 9:03 received by R.William
--------------------------------------------------------
lutherpraveen
PDOCT05
i99
helpme1234
kingnaga
waitforgc123
Rohan99
gclongwaytogo
cool_cat
sivanu
GKBest
bluesky1
greener_pasture

July 4th
------------------------------------
waiting4_gc

July 5th
------------------------------------
chalamcharla
mbsac
inr

July 9, at 11.07 am at Nebraska signed by F.HEINAUER
------------------------------------------------------
krustycat

July 11, at 11.24 am at Nebraska signed by F.HEINAUER
-----------------------------------------------------
technoboy
jthomas

July 13, at 11.11 am at Nebraska signed by F.HEINAUER
------------------------------------------------------
gcnm04

July 16, 9:00 am at Nebraska signed by R Pitcher
--------------------------------------
viveckj99
gcspace

July 16, at 11.16 am at Nebraska signed by F.HEINAUER
------------------------------------------------------
fetch_gc

Guys, Please don't fight.
We cannot get far with this EB2 Vs EB3 fight.

We understand EB3's situation, however pitting one against another will not help.

Sanhari: why not take your efforts one step ahead and work for fixes like visa recapture. That would be permanent solution and doesnot favor any particular group. You will be able to get support of EB2 and EB1 folks.

I know IV core is focusing its efforts on CIR. CIR is dead meat or going to be... considering this, is IV core working on any piecemeal reforms? Can somebody from the IV core comment????

I did not want to respond you but here's what can be achieved by lifting the country caps even for 2 years. If you lift the country cap, oldest PDs get the green Cards irrespective of their country, considering it's Indians & Chinese who are stuck the most, believe it or not, India will get all of 140K Visas, you can easily expect India and china to come at par with ROW, I know with your intelligence level, it is hard for you to understand, but if you are in a line, you are always going to get benefited if more people before you get eliminated fom the queue...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please DO NOT join this selfish effort aimed at fixing the country limits till MIRAGE gets his green card.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Removal of country limits temporarily and permanently, will both require the support of the majority of both houses of the congress. It will require as much effort to to remove country limits temporarily as it will require to remove country limits permanently.

Some folks here just wants to remove country limits till the time they get their agree card i.e. for the span of 2 years. If removal of country limits is good for EB community and America, then why only remove it for 2 years ONLY.

Such a campaign is likely to divide this community. PLEASE DO NOT divide the community by supporting this mis-directed agenda.

If country caps can be removed temporarily then they can be removed permanently. But asking for less than what key lawmakers have already proposed less than 6 months back is like shooting ourselves in the foot. PLEASE DO NOT throw others under the bus. PLEASE!!!!

My labour and I-140 is approved last year and I am working with current employer from last 1 and half years. Employer is making good money trough me.

As now the dates are current, my employer is trying to exploit me.
He is not responding to my mails, and not picking my phone.

Last modified message which I got from him is that:

The whole financials for the company changes with filing 485 for you immediately. So, it is definitely a loss for company to process your 485 immediately.

you need to come with items that you are ready to compromise in return; so that the company also benefits by helping you."

I am very much in tension and he is talking to me.

Can someone suggest what may be the option for me?

If this is the exact verbiage from his email, You can sue him for lying that filing for your 485 is a loss to company. Talk to a lawyer like Rajiv Khanna or Shusterman if he doesn't hep you file 485 before PD retrogresses. Get as much evidence as possible in email mean while, to set the record straight with a good law suit. If I were you, I would naively try to send an email explaining him that you have no intentions to abandon, company's financials are not affected because of your 485 (its totally personal) and get more crooked responses. Disgusting mo fo's. The most f#$%^ing irony is these AH's have gone through this and know the pain.