Saturday, April 30, 2011
Wow. Talk about going off in two different directions. You need to coordinate your gays, honey. Because hair and makeup gays made you look fabulous and fashion gay made you look shapeless. We think you know who needs to be set on fire.
Couldabin a great dress. We really like the color on her, but there definitely needed to be some tweaking and zhuzhing along the way. We think the strap needs to be quite a bit thinner. It's throwing off her whole shape. And since she's not shaped like a model and not wearing the floor length version the model is, a belt probably would have been a good idea.
And Hollywood? The jig is up. We know you're all rich and we know you all get freebies and loaners. Going out without any jewelry on doesn't make you look salt of the earth - and besides, that's not what you were put on this planet for. We expect glamour and lots of jewels that need to be returned within 48 hours. Here you have a major movie star at her premiere in Paris, and the only thing she's got on is her engagement ring. Tsk. How Amish. Hop to it, stylists. The New Austerity is boring.
VOTE NOW!
IN! She looks sassy and sexy and she doesn't need jewelry, gays! They can't ALL be Cher, y'know!
OUT! She looks like a pincushion with legs!
IN! She looks sassy and sexy and she doesn't need jewelry, gays! They can't ALL be Cher, y'know!
OUT! She looks like a pincushion with legs!
Minion Opinion on Anna Kendrick's slutty '80s secretary costume? OUT.
[Photo Credit: getty, wireimage, style.com]
Post a Comment
Labels: Fashion, Giambattista Valli, In or Out, Red Carpet, Reese Witherspoon
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment