Mike Tyson Tattoos

EB2 India will move very fast till 01 JAN 06 as because based on June 2007 bulletin, just before the july fiasco,( http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3236.html ) the PD for China is 01 JAN 06. That means in EB2 Category except India and China every other country is current. So till India reaches 01 JAN 06 PD in EB2, all the spill overs will be moved to EB2 India. By the time India EB2 reaches 01 JAN 06, China PD in EB2 will move further from 01 JAN 06 by using its 7% quota. So Inidia PD for EB2 again moves fast till that changed China PD using the spill overs. After that India and China will share the spill overs based on the PD priority. All this happens if and only if the USCIS works effectively and uses all the available visa numbers for the present fiscal year. My prediction for EB2 India PD is it touch 2005 /even cross few months in 2005 by the end of this year if USCIS works effectively.

July 07 was a very special case. Throughout the year the USCIS had not issues many visa's, and per the ombudsmans report in May they were going so slow that they would relaly have to scramble if they dont waste tons of visas.
They year by all reports they are using up visa numbers at a quick pace. WHy do you think they will jump all the way to 2006?

Just getting spillover is not enough, if the total demand for visa's is high. Case in point is EB3-ROW which technically has almost no limits, yet languishes in a retrogressed state because the total number of visa's (140k) is too low and however you divvy them up people are going to end up waiting...

I recant my earlier outburst at mercies since I realize that he was acting as a messenger to the problem. Sorry for the offense mercies.

There are many people who would just run away from effort when doubts are raised and since people of afraid of being punished for just advocating a public policy or writing a letter to congress in the first place. I would request you to not reproduce posts here or on portal that would echo the material the plants fear and doubts among members. When the core group is spending 2-3 hours a day on top of their fulltime job plus the weekends, plus out of pocket expenses on travel to DC, its disheartening when a post on forum scares away sceptical members.

I have already edited my earlier post.

I understand that there is lot of fear among applicants that USCIS might retrogress the dates interimly sometime in july due to the expected high volume of applications filing in the begining of july.

To minimize the chance of USCIS from taking any such steps, shall we all unite and file the applications on a specific date in july probably on 30th of july? This will accomodate all applicants...so that we shall all be winners and use this opportunity to our advantage instead of competing amongst each other...where only a few will be winners and others will be loosers.

This will also reduce the pressure among applicants , attorneys and doctors.

Can the AILA cooperate? Will there be unity amongst applicants to make this possible??? any ideas ??

Dude, From your previous posts looks like you have already filed and got your receipt notice.

http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=87755#post87755
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=80880#post80880

Well, this is not a good idea ... and obviously every one is as anxious as others to get their papers filed on time. This does not make sense at all. I read your posting history and notice your posts with GC approval and also about receipt notice for spouse.

What is goin on with you ?

Hello,

Great! I sent individual messages to all senators through their websites and was able to send a 'hand delivered' message to Jeff Sessions for $8.95 through following website (https://ssl.congress.org/congressorg/mailapp/).

For those interested, here is the link to the body of the message (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/members-forum/24810-viral-video-clear-up-legal-immigration-issues.html#post383866).

I know that I'm focusing on a small part of what our community needs, but hope it's a small step to improve immigration for us and all future immigrants.

Receipting is not done by VO and the staff who do receipting follow certain procedures.

USCIS mailroom has certain protocols and thats why even our AC21 documentation does not reach file.

Files are distributed to different officers and they work on the files.

Without a receipt number you cannot track your MTR.

Talk to a very good Attorney on further course of action.

I filed MTR - my 485 was denied because the officer ignored the AC21 job change. When I called customer service and explained - I was transferred to a VO and when I explained it, she requested me to file an appeal so that I don't have to pay instead f MTR.

When I talked to Attorney - she said "Don't do that - when your MTR gets receipted, you can track it but cannot track an appeal"

Remember MTR = if USCIS makes a mistake - MTR costs $$
Appeal = if you want AAO to consider various factors on a correctly interpreted denial and appeal to see if you can convince.

Good information, thank you.

Hi Ebizash-

Did you noticed any LUD on your case today

Hi Ebizash-

Did you noticed any LUD today on ure AP renewal case

Highly suspicious. I would call ICE and confirm. Also, I would ask this "officer" to visit at the workplace in presence of your lawyer. No one has any business visiting your residence for enforcement of a work-related visa. Be careful; consult with your attorney before entertaining any such request.

I second that. Why a visit at home? Workplace is the obvious place (actually calling YOU in the normal interview method). Call back and confirm... this could be a prank from some soon to be "ex" friend.

while only a handful of members expressed their enthusiasm, the core and rest seem to not care about this proposal.

CORE members, do you have any inputs here? It necessarily doesnot have to be agreeing with us, just that ur silence bothers me!

Considering the current economic situation, i donot expect much progress in addressing country quota elimination/CIR's.
We should atleast try to get our issues addressed in bits and pieces. Overall, anything to address retrogression should be welcomed! rather than 'debate and beat the horse to death.'

:rolleyes:Both were EB2 from the same company. PD on one was Oct/2006 and the other was Feb/2002.

SANBAJ, congrates finally your suffering in GCJourney came to an end!!!

I have only 1 CG application and no question to interfile (read jealous:)), but after reading this thread, one my co-worker also from india asked this.

She is waiting for GC for more than 5 years, has 2 different I-140s. But should she go for interfilling? Let me ask this question to fellow sufferers.

Our company lawyer never answers question in details, and is not responding on this. She will have to send directly to USCIS in case...

First I-140 - Company A - EB3 - PD July 2003 - approved June 2007 - nothing further, she has the copy of I-140 approval notice though.
Second I-140 - Company B - EB2 - PD Jan 2006 - approved April 2007 - currently filed in july 07

Even after so much begging, the lawyer refused to entertain her and did not asked for PD transfer.

Her husband is working using EAD since last year, is not in H4 status anymore. This is why she is extremely cautious and not taking any chance with her pending I-485. (afraid to interfile all these days.)

What can she do now? I know her EB2 is current as if August 2008, so that is another factor to consider.

Thoughts?

Boss,
He/she explained the actual thing later on at Murthy forum ....

#####
nisars
Member posted July 27, 2007 09:50 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
here are the answers...

Here are the answers...

When did you receive the receipt notice?
Yesterday from my Lawyer.

Did your checks get cleared?
I believe YES, required checks were issue from the law firm's account, No personal.

What was your receipt date on the notice?
Receipt Date is July 09th (I confirmed Online).

Thanks,
NisarS
######




what is this? there are delivered date and received date with received date before the delivered date. How can they receive before the delivery. Hmmm Did USCIS guys ran early morning 4 O Clock to UPS/ FED-EX/ ETC to receive the app before those guys attempted to deliver :) Even if someone says, "YES", there was 6 days difference between those two days. No idea what USCIS is doing.

Got Receipt

Application Received on : 07/03/2007
Agency : Nebraska
Status : Delivered on 07/09/2007
Case: EB3-India Jan 2004
Returned/Rejected : Accepted, got Receipt # LIN xxx-xxx-xxxx.

wcs, Welcome to IV.
The campaign has been in place for almost 2 months. Thousands of letters have already been mailed out. The deadline is Mar 10. Please pick out a format and mail U'r letter to the president and IV ASAP.
Sample letter formats can be located at
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16506

Hello,

As we are aware that Immigrationvoice is going to send massive letters to Mr. President by saying broken immigration system.
Does anyone know that those letters already sent to white house or not? If yes, is there any reply from white house or not.

Please share it here.

Sorry to hear someone hurting this much!


ABEY DHAKKAN

TRUTH HURTS AND WHY ARE SO SORRY..

DID ANYONE ASK U FOR YOUR WISE COMMENTS ..

KEEP UR TRAP SHUT IF U HAVE NOTHING TO SAY

Thanks Harsh..

you think it is safer to submit the last 2/3 paystubs while on H1 earlier along with the other documents we submit while filing for H1, or not even submit them.. I know the officer is at full liberty to ask whatever document he fancies at that moment and my stars at that time..

Do you think they will ask for the W2's while on H1 period..?

others too, pls share your thoughts.

Just I got the success message, it's working!!!

Here are details of my interview:

VO: what do you do?
I: Software engineer.
VO: How many employees in your company?
I: 20-25
VO: I see your english is not good. How will you be able to do your job?
I: You are the first person to tell me in last 4 years that I cant do my job due to poor english.
[At this point I was ticked off]
VO: How long did you work for last employer?
I: 18 months
VO: How many employees in previous company?
I: 150
VO: How many Indians?
I: I dont know. Ask the employer.
VO: Is this company owned by Indians?
I: I dont ask my boss his citizenship status.
VO: Have you worked with them before?
I: Yes, I am here just to revalidate my visa.
VO: Why you are working for a small company?
I: My preference.
VO: How much salary do you earn?
I: XYZ USD per annum.
VO: Thank you very much sir, your visa is approved.

Didnt bother to thank her, just turned my back and walked away. Visa came by mail.

coming soon..rated r, for scary images....will make everyone cry!!
Playing on a computer screen near you!!!.....

'v-i-s-a b-u-l-l-e-t-i-n...december 2009"


*disclaimer: Can cause serious mental distress, suicidal thougths, depression, excessive alcohol consumption. Not recommended for eb-xi/c, eb-3 row.country of birth restrictions apply.

good one!

Can we have a letter / online fax campaign atleast...

May be a letter from Rep Longfren etc.

We need someone to youtube this and help with the media campaign!

Instead to lobbying politicians, why don't we file tons of lawsuits againt USCIS for the process delay? July my opinion.

on Oct 23 mine and daughters GC were approved.
But not for wife. do i need to file service request for her or something?

Many Thanks to IV!

Congrats!!..

BTW,which service centre?

I don't know why do we (EB community) support it?

1. There is no economic sense for DREAM act. You are going to make illegal people legal - without any much restrictions. How about kids of people who are waiting for their GCs (kids born in native country)? Don't you see any unfair treatment handed out to kids of legal immigrants.

2. Why not give them legal status until age of 18 or 21, then they must prove their worth to economy by going to F1 visa , h1 visa & using available path to immigration?

3. It is about re-uniting families - There are people struggling in legal immigration queue who want to unite with their families - parents - there is no provision in law or effort of making it possible.

This is all politics & I will never support it.