Mike Tyson Tattoos

Guys,

this doubt is bugging me due to recession fears.

if someone is on h1 status & have filed 485 in july 07. what happens when due to recession he/she is out of job (NO PAYROLL) for 3-4 months.
will the person have problems during 485 approval?? whats the possible negative that can happen in such god not willing situation

http://immigration.lawyers.com/ask-a-lawyer/AC21-Change-Of-Employers-5713.html

^^^bump^^^^^^^^^^

I think in your case it's OK

I agree about the mouth thing...It's hard to not make it look like a stupid smirk or snowman nose :lol:

If it is mentioned in I-140 approval, do we supposed to write in I-485 and other applications? As I understand, A# is registration # and which is assigned when I-485 is accepted? Please somebody confirm it.


That's your alien number and it's given to you when your I140 is approved. See my post above.

:) Even if USCIS says that they cant predict future cut-off dates, its not going to slow down the prediction-pundits on IV. Soon we'll have a thread out for December Visa Bulletin prediction!!

I vaguely remember a big guy from uscis presenting a awafully hopeless picture on forward movement (just before june/luly 09), there was a generous spill over in sep09 and dates moved forward (hopefully neverto go back). I donot believe what these non serious guys say. Let us hope for the best.

If one is on H1B...applied 485...almost done with 6 years...but got h1b approval for 3 years because of approved I-140...now 485 got denied...should i go back because i completed my six years? or can i stay as long as my H1 is valid (beyond 6 years)?

My greencard application has stuck in name checks for 3 years. I recently filed a Writ of Mandamus. Before going to court, U.S. Attorneys filed to dismiss my case, citing that the adjustment of status is discretionary and the FBI can take as long as they want to do background checks.

I am hesitating whether to go ahead with a court hearing. In addition, I am not happy with my current lawyer.

Can someone recommend a good lawyer to me? Many thanks!

YL

My experience is that even with the "1/focal length" rule (or maybe it should be "1/(focal length x crop factor)") is a bit optimistic with these long tele shots. Maybe it can work if you have really good technique and a sturdy tripod but I like to use a much shorter shutter time if possible.

Well, I do okay with it, though I will go faster if there's enough light of course. I like the quality at ISO400, and usually stay there or below. The tripod is essential, I bought a big Gitzo carbon fiber model which is light, but will hold ~32lbs. With a wide stance on the legs, I can shoot, & pan reliably with the Wimberly.